Janean Guz: So Fox may be manipulating polling data?Unpossible!!!Edit: Added my own link so everthing is more fair and balanced.
Sherita Gallati: Hillary, i've got continually favorite brains in the tip. and albeit, once you're balloting based off of seems, then you definately haven't any precise to whinge approximately something undesirable that occurs. attempt finding at matters for a transformation, you will possibly be able to discover that the attractive face has some fairly gruesome skeletons.
Karey Dunken: Your just being anal,I have had this happen at a lot of sites.It might be their servers.
Tyree Allenbrand: I'm sure she just deals with it and trys not to take it to heart. She must be so used to it by now think about it. I bet deep down it does bother her though.
Antwan Schrum: They thought he was done talking
Oscar Waddups: if it updates at midnight how did the 11971 votes get there already? and it's an all day poll, it closes at m! idnight.
Matt Tiry: Don't you wish we had a real President again?
Jayson Brod: i think it would bother hillary seeing obama win so much but i think that when obama wins its cause he says good speeches
Claire Billegas: If it didn't bother her to have her husbands affair published in "every detail" it is not likely anything she reads in the media would bother her.
Marita Stadick: Me to :)
Eldridge Rieves: No, it simply proves that Fixed Noise only accepts responses that agree with their agenda and dismisses or ignores the ones that oppose it (a lot like the neo-cons here who block people who disagree with them) ...that shouldn't be a surprise, though.
Gladys Worthing: So? Polls often have time limits.CNN flew people in to plant them in the republican debates and amazingly selected them out of hundreds of people just to create chaos to report on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_KerrCNN also sent reporters to disgrace the tea party and one! had a temper tantrum when anyone disagreed with her. http://w! ww.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/24/susan-roe...And wasn’t it MSNBC who was forced to pull Olbermann from the Republican Nation Convention coverage because of the blatant and absurd bias he showed to which even his co host was upset because it was so bad. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/09/0...Or maybe Dan Rather using forged documents to condemn Bush on CBS?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RathergateFox has a massive lead in the ratings because they proved time and again that they provide both sides of the story and people respect that (even most liberals).http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bia......Show more
Brenton Cornwall: They probably call it an unscientific poll. All polls have to take these kinds of things into consideration. The poll may only update at midnight. You have no legal obligation to any poll.
Antone Bual: believing ANYTHING at fox should be (illegal)
Lindsey Zanardi: The truth has set them free ~~ http://youtu.b! e/nRM00LPWVLE
Leisa Brodnex: Fox News polls are not scientific. So write a letter to them and complain if it bothers you that much.Obviously, you have the time to do it.
Randall Twehous: Hmhmm, maybe not? If she is willing to be our president then she should be strong about it. But it should start bothring her when she's not getting the votes.
Mario Stricklan: I wonder if it bothers her when she looks in a mirror.
Gladys Worthing: Online voluntary polls are absolutely not credible since people try to vote more than once in assumption that it is more than a game. Scientific polls are conducted with restricted sample and tracked participation.As for the legality of it, considering the fact that the online polls are created for entertainment purpose and there was no harm to anyone, FOX as a private company can pretty much do whatever they want with their property (which includes website)....Show more
Germaine Tieken: No its probably right, they ju! st don't count the people who don't make the correct choice when voting! . They only consider the opinions of people who pick what they want them to.
Refugio Gastineau: Funny, the PEW poll always says something good about fox. Wonder why...
Charissa Bichsel: a good speech from a good man. just think what more he could do in a 2nd term.
Carter Edstrom: Wow! You living an exciting life!
Danyell Rowback: Of course it bothers her,but then who cares.
Janean Guz: It could be that votes from the same IP address don't count, or the site is wrong.
Krystal Cordovano: Would you go so far to say that you got a "tingle" up your leg? You may just end up having to fight Matthews for him.
Mercedez Trabue: Even Eric Cantor!!? I almost passed out from disbelief!!
Tyrone Disanti: but the library doesnt have the same ip address as me
Ardell Luy: Lol. It's called politeness
Jules Ashbach: Good point Zeke.
Marya Fehn: I think she'd be more bothered by the horrendous pictures everyone takes of her.S! eeing "Obama win" only adds to her frustration.
Brittney Inabnit: this is actually pretty typical of FOX News....they once sued for the right to lie..... and sadly won the case.
Piedad Bassiti: She will only be upset when she can no longer raise millions.!~!
Ronnie Barcus: It does now. But I think it's a little late. It should have bothered her much early on. Maybe she would have changed campaign strategies faster.Let's face it. Some people bungled up her campaign real bad in the beginning. Now it's back on track.But she's strong, used to a race, but not used to losing. She's probably more angry than bothered....Show more
Jesusita Dykhoff: the melting point of lard is near 30 º C
Carmina Stickney: The cons on this site are not of the intelligent kind; therefore, don't expect an articulate or well-thought out response from them. All you will get from them is this: "Obama is an evil Socialist, Kenyan Marxist." All they can do is parrot their ! far-right radio show hosts. It's sad, really.
Elli Esaw: YEAH. ! how 'bout THAT? (altho' repugnants WILL do anything to make themselves look rational while being batshyte crazy).
Brock Anwar: and keeps seeing "Obama wins" at the beginning of an article?
Rocio Karvis: well... there are no LAWS to make it illegal... but it certainly calls into question the "results" of Fox News online polls...it's not usually illegal to lie (unless you're under oath or lying to police)... it just means no one will trust you...and that's kind of a problem for a news organization......Show more
Branden Roddick: Because some people can't help it, they just have to hate. Its sad that they would rather America fail then to work with the president at all.
Rana Rudell: to Melt Rosie O'Donnell? because I think she might be headed for a place that could possibly do it.
Sena Highman: And this surprised you?
Christiane Cattano: dogter-- yes she has a right to an opinion... Just as I do.. and I think that she is a low life scum bag! that's a disgrace to human kind !!! And in my OPINION she is doomed for HELL
No comments:
Post a Comment